The kantian phenomenology: Between representationalism and constructivism
Main Article Content
Abstract
This present study attempts to, in the first place, explain the conception of phenomenology within the Kantian philosophical project. At the same time, we devote a special attention to the probable influence of Lambert’s Phenomenology in the genesis of the critical philosophy of Kant. Since both authors share the methodological ideal of reforming the entire existing philosophical system in order to avoid the excesses of rationalism. Then we try to present the evolution of this concept (phenomenology) after Kant’s transcendental turn from the publication of the Critique of Pure Reason. Thus, we distinguish two different conceptions of the phenomenology in Kant according to the division of philosophy in pre-critical (representationalist Phenomenology) and critical (constructive Phenomenology) periods. Finally, we present the status of pre-Husserlian phenomenology in the post-Kantian philosophy.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The Revista de Filosofía UCSC is an open access journal and does not charge for publication. In addition, it regulates its Copyright and access policy according to the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International Public License (CC BY-NC 4.0), therefore sharing (reproducing and distributing the material in any medium or format) and adaptation (modifying, transforming, and creating from the material) is allowed as long as proper credit is given and the citation is included with the corresponding data. Moreover, it is not allowed to use the material for commercial purposes.
References
Baensch, O. (1978). Johann Heinrich Lamberts Philosophie und seine Stellung zu Kant. Hildesheim: Gerstenberg.
Beiser, F. (1987). The Fate of Reason. German Philosophy from Kant to Fichte. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Cañedo-Argüelles, J. A. (1982). Ciencia y metafísica en el Kant precrítico (1746-1764). Sevilla: Secretariado de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Sevilla.
Cohen, H. (1871). Kants Theorie der Erfahrung. Berlin: Dümmler.
Colomer, E. (2002). El Pensamiento Alemán. De Kant a Heidegger (Vol. III). Barcelona: Herder.
Debru, C. (1977). Analyse et représentation. De la méthodologie à la théorie de l’espace: Kant et Lambert. Paris: Vrin.
Didier, F. (1998). Más allá de la Fenomenología. In M. P. Peñaranda & J. G. l. López (Eds.), Congreso Fenomenología y Ciencías Humanas: Santiago de Compostela, 24-28 de Septiembre de 1996. Santiago de Compostela: Universidade de Santiago de Compostela.
Ewald, W. B. (1996). From Kant to Hilbert. A Source Book in the Foundations of
Mathematics (Vol. I). New York: Oxford University Press.
Ferraguto, F. (2012). Il concetto di fenomenología dalla tradizione prekantiana
all´idealismo tedesco. In A. Cimino & V. Costa (Eds.), Storia della fenomenologia. Roma: Carocci.
Gabriel, M. (2011). Transcendental Ontology. Essays in German Idealism. New York: Continuum.
Gray, J. (2007). Worlds out of nothing. A course in the history of geometry in the 19th century. London: Springer.
Kant, I. (1911a). Kritik der reinen Vernunft. In Akademie (Ed.), Kant´s Gesammelte Schriften (Vol. III). Berlin: Reimer.
Kant, I. (1911b). Metaphysische Anfangsgründe der Naturwissenschaft. In Akademie (Ed.), Kant´s Gesammelte Schriften (Vol. IV). Berlin: Reimer.
Kant, I. (1911c). Prolegomena zu einer jeden künftigen Metaphysik, die als
Wissenschaft wird auftreten können. In Akademie (Ed.), Kant´s Gesammelte Schriften (Vol. IV). Berlin: Reimer.
Kant, I. (1912). De mundi sensibilis atque intelligibilis forma et principiis. In Akademie (Ed.), Kant´s Gesammelte Schriften (Vol. II). Berlin: Reimer.
Kant, I. (1922). Kant´s Briefwechsel I: 1747-1788. In Akademie (Ed.), Kant´s Gesammelte Schriften (Vol. X). Berlin: Reimer.
Kant, I. (1928). Reflexionen zur Metaphysik. In Akademie (Ed.), Kant´s Gesammelte Schriften (Vol. XVIII). Berlin: Reimer.
Kuehn, M. (2001). Kant. A Biography. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Lambert, J. H. (1764). Neues Organon oder Gedanken über die Erforschung und Bezeichnung des Wahren und dessen Unterscheidung vom Irrthum und Schein. (Vol. 1). Leipzig: Hey Johann Wendler.
Marcelo, J. H. (2014). Arqueología de la Fenomenología. Tras los pasos de Ötinger y Lambert. Revista de Filosofía. Universidad Católica de la Santísima Concepción de Chile, 13(2), 87-116.
Millán-Zaibert, E. (2007). Friedrich Schlegel and the emergence of romantic philosophy. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Moran, D. (2001). Introduction to Phenomenology. London: Routledge.
Novalis. (1983). Das philosophische Werk (Vol. II). Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.
Piché, C. (2004). Kant, heredero del método fenomenológico de Lambert. ÉNDOXA: Series Filosóficas, 18, 45-67.
Reid, J. (2009). How Reinhold Helped Hegel Understand the German Enlightenment and Grasp the Pantheism Controversy. In G. D. Giovanni (Ed.), Karl Leonhard Reinhold and the Enlightenment. Dordrecht/London: Springer.
Reinhold, K. L. (1802). Beyträge zur leichtern Übersicht des Zustandes der Philosophie beym Anfange des 19. Jahrhunderts (Vol. IV). Hamburg: Perthes.
Ricoeur, P. (1986). A l’école de la Phénoménologie. Paris: Vrin.
Rockmore, T. (2011). Kant and Phenomenology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Schönfeld, T. M. (2000). The Philosophy of the Young Kant. The Precritical Project.
Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.
Spiegelberg, H. (1982). The Phenomenological Movement. The Hague: Nijhoff,.
Waibel, V., Breazeale, D., & Rockmore, T. (Eds.). (2010). Fichte and the Phenomenological Tradition. Berlin/New York: De Gruyter.
Waldenfels, B. (1983). Phänomenologie in Frankreich. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Watson, S. (2009). In the Shadow of Phenomenology: Writings After Merleau-Ponty I. London/New York: Continuum.
Werkmeister, W. H. (1980). Kant. The architectonic and development of his philosophy. La Salle/Illinois: Open Court