An existential and personal reason: apprehension and assent in John Henry Newman
Main Article Content
Abstract
John Henry Newman (1801-1890), who has had an enormous intellectual influence on the development of contemporary Catholic theology, is less known for his contributions to philosophy. By examining his main philosophical work, An Essay in Aid of a Grammar of Assent, we attempt to show how the concepts of apprehension and assent reflect a theory of knowledge of an existential and personal nature, in clear confrontation with the prevailing rationalism of his time. Through the examination of these notions, in the complex conceptual framework of the Grammar, we aim to justify that there are many elements by which Newman can be considered fully a philosopher, as he significantly contributes to a personalist epistemology and anthropology.
Downloads
Article Details
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-nc/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The Revista de Filosofía UCSC is an open access journal and does not charge for publication. In addition, it regulates its Copyright and access policy according to the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International Public License (CC BY-NC 4.0), therefore sharing (reproducing and distributing the material in any medium or format) and adaptation (modifying, transforming, and creating from the material) is allowed as long as proper credit is given and the citation is included with the corresponding data. Moreover, it is not allowed to use the material for commercial purposes.
References
Aquino, F. (2010): ‘Externalism and Internalism: A Newmanian Matter of Proper Fit’, The Heythrop Journal, 51, pp. 1023-1034.
Athié, R. (2001): El asentimiento en J. H. Newman, Pamplona: Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Navarra.
Athié, R. (2012): ‘La racionalidad del asentimiento religioso’, Efemérides Mexicana, 88(30), pp. 3-14.
Briones, R. (2018): ‘Todo el hombre razona: La dimensión implícita de la inferencia en John Henry Newman’, Revista de Filosofía UCSC, 17(2), pp. 63-85.
Cabrero, F. (2001): La «otra» racionalidad: el conocimiento real en la obra de J. H. Newman, Salamanca: Centro de Estudios Orientales y Ecuménicos Juan XXIII.
Caiazza, J. (2008): ‘Religious Belief in Newman’s Grammar of Assent’, Modern Age, 50(1), pp. 24-32.
Casey, G. (1984): Natural Reason: A Study of the Notions of Inference, Assent, Intuition and First Principles in the Philosophy of John Henry Cardinal Newman, New York: Peter Lang.
Corbett, E. (1982): ‘A Comparison of John Locke and John Henry Newman on the Rhetoric of Assent’, Rhetoric Review, 1(1), pp. 40-49.
Cronin, J. F. (1935): Cardinal Newman: his Theory of Knowledge, Washington: The Catholic University of America.
Crosby, J. F. (2017): El personalismo de John Henry Newman, Trad. N. Gómez, Madrid: Palabra.
Gilley, Sh. (2009): ‘Life and Writings’, in Ker, I., Merrigan, T. (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to John Henry Newman, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1-28.
Locke, J. (1992): Ensayo sobre el entendimiento humano, Trad. E. O’Gorman, México DF: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Mauti, R. (2010): ‘Creemos porque amamos: La estructura interna del acto de fe en John Henry Newman’, Revista Teología, 101(97), pp. 139-154.
Newman, J. H. (2010): Apología pro vita sua: Historia de mis ideas religiosas, Trad. V. García y J. Morales, Madrid: Encuentro.
Newman, J. H. (2010): Ensayo para contribuir a una gramática del asentimiento, Trad. J. Vives, Madrid: Encuentro.
Newman, J. H. (2014): An Essay in Aid of a Grammar of Assent, Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
Norris, Th. (2009): ‘Faith’, in Ker, I., Merrigan, T. (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to John Henry Newman, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 73-97.
Rombold, G. (1993): ‘John Henry Newman (1801-1890)’, in Coreth, E. et al. (eds.), Filosofía cristiana en el pensamiento católico de los siglos XIX y XX, Madrid: Encuentro, pp. 672-701.
Steinberg, E. (1987): ‘Newman’s Distinction between Inference and Assent’, Religious Studies, 23(3), pp. 351-365.