Deliberative democracy vis a vis Chantal Mouffe’s agonistic pluralism
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
I seek to defend deliberative democracy by subjecting to criticism one of its contenders, Chantal Mouffe’s agonistic pluralism. First, I reconstruct the vision that deliberative democracy and populism have about the relationship between the political and truth. Second, I connect the vision each have to the distinction between deliberation and negotiation. Third, I demonstrate that Mouffe, by denying the existence of any relevant relationship between the political and truth, wounds up defending a kind of politics in which negotiation becomes the properly “political” kind of action. I make the argument that this leads to a commodified vision of politics. Lastly, I argue that politics so conceived is highly disfunctional.
Article Details
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The Revista de Filosofía UCSC is an open access journal and does not charge for publication. In addition, it regulates its Copyright and access policy according to the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International Public License (CC BY-NC 4.0), therefore sharing (reproducing and distributing the material in any medium or format) and adaptation (modifying, transforming, and creating from the material) is allowed as long as proper credit is given and the citation is included with the corresponding data. Moreover, it is not allowed to use the material for commercial purposes.
How to Cite
References
Arendt, H. (1996). Entre el pasado y el futuro. Ocho ejercicios sobre la reflexión política. Península.
Arendt, H. (2015). La Promesa de la Política. Paidós.
Atria, F. (2016). La Forma del Derecho. Marcial Pons. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/jj.2321948
Baxter, H. (2011). Habermas: The Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Stanford University. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11126/stanford/9780804769129.001.0001
Benhabib, S. (2013). Reason-Giving and Rights-Bearing: Constructing the Subject of Rights. Constellations, 20(1), 38-50. https://doi.org/10.1111/cons.12027 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cons.12027
Brandom, R. (1995). Knowledge and the Social Articulation of the Space of Reasons. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 55(4), 895-908. https://doi.org/10.2307/2108339 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2108339
Brandom, R. (2000). Articulating Reasons: an introduction to inferentialism. Harvard University. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674028739
Camargo, R. (2011). El sublime retorno de la ideología. De Platón a Zizek. Metales Pesados.
Cohen, J. (2009). Truth and Public Reason. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 37(1), 2-42. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1088-4963.2008.01144.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1088-4963.2008.01144.x
Critchley, S. (2004). Is there a normative deficity in the Theory of Hegemony? En Critchley, S., y Marchart, O. (Eds.), Laclau a Critical Reader (pp. 113-133). Routledge.
Crouch, C. (2004). Post-Democracy. Polity.
Devenney, M. (2004). Ethics and politics in discourse Theory. En Critchley, S., y Marchart, O. (Eds.), Laclau a Critical Reader (pp. 123-139). Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203482056-14
Dryzek, J. S. (2005). Deliberative Democracy in Divided Societies: Alternatives to Agonism and Analgesia. Political Theory, 33(2), 218-242. https://doi.org/10.1177/0090591704268372 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0090591704268372
Dworkin, R. (2011). Justice for Hedgehogs. Cambridge University. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674059337
Eagleton, T. (2006). On telling the truth. Socialist Register, 42, 269-285.
Eagleton, T. (2019). Ideología. Una introducción. Paidós.
Fossen, T. (2011). Politicizing Brandom’s Pragmatism: Normativity and the Agonal Character of Social Practice. European Journal of Philosophy, 22(3), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0378.2011.00504.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0378.2011.00504.x
Fossen, T. (2013). Taking Stances, Contesting Commitments: Political Legitimacy and the Pragmatic Turn. The Journal of Political Philosophy, 21(4), 426–450. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopp.12003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jopp.12003
Frankfurt, H. (1988). The importance of what we care about: philosophical essays. Cambridge University. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511818172
Fraser, N. (2019). ¡Contrahegemonía ya! Por un populismo progresista que enfrente al neoliberalismo. Siglo XXI.
Habermas, J. (1986). Between Facts and Norms. MIT.
Habermas, J. (2003). Truth and Justification. MIT.
Habermas, J. (2006): Political Communication in Media Society: Does Democracy Still Enjoy an Epistemic Dimension? The Impact of Normative Theory on Empirical Research. Communication Theory, 16(4), 411-426. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2006.00280.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2006.00280.x
Habermas, J. (2020). Commentary on, Cristina Lafont, Democracy Without Shortcuts. Journal of Deliberative Democracy, 16(2), 10–14. https://doi.org/10.16997/jdd.397 DOI: https://doi.org/10.16997/jdd.397
Honneth, A. (2003). Redistribution as recognition: a response to Nancy Fraser. En A. Honneth y N. Fraser (Eds.), Redistribution and Recognition (pp.110-197). Verso.
Honneth, A. (2017). The idea of socialism: towards a renewal. Polity.
Lilla, M. (2017). The Once and Future Liberal: After identity politics. Oxford University.
Martí, J. L. (2017). Pluralism and consensus in deliberative democracy. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 20(5), 1-24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13698230.2017.1328089
Mouffe, C. (2000). Deliberative Democracy or Agonistic Pluralism. Political Science Series, 72, 1-15.
Mouffe, C. (2002a). Politics and Passions. Centre for the Study of Democracy, 1-16.
Mouffe, C. (2002b). Which Public Sphere for a Democratic Society? Journal of Social and Political Theory, 99, 55-65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3167/004058102782485448
Mouffe, C. (2003). La paradoja Democrática. Gedisa.
Mouffe, C. (2005). The return of the political. Verso.
Mouffe, C. (2008). Politics, democratic action, and solidarity. Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, 38(2), 99-108. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00201749508602377
Mouffe, C. (2013). Agonistics. Thinking the world politically. Verso.
Mouffe, C., y Laclau, E. (2014). Hegemony and Socialist Strategy. Verso.
Mouffe, C. (2018). For a left populism. Verso.
Ormeño, J. (2009). Objetividad moral y política. Derecho y Humanidades, (15), 75–82.
Olivares, E. (2015). ¿La democracia contemporánea demanda agonismo o deliberación? Astrolabio, 14, 168–192. https://doi.org/10.55441/1668.7515.n14.10734 DOI: https://doi.org/10.55441/1668.7515.n14.10734
Peña, C. (2008). Democracia Liberal. Derecho y Humanidades, (14), 31-36. https://derechoyhumanidades.uchile.cl/index.php/RDH/article/view/16028
Peña, C. (2010). Rawls y el problema de la justificación en filosofía política. [Tesis Doctoral, Universidad de Chile]. https://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/108605
Peña, C. (2021). Ideas Periódicas. Introducción a la Sociedad de hoy. El Mercurio.
Sharon, A. (2018). Populism and democracy: The challenge for deliberative democracy. European Journal of Philosophy,27(2), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejop.12400 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ejop.12400
Strawson, P. (1962). Freedom and Resentment. Proceedings of the British Academy, 48, 187-211.
Streeck, W. (2012). Citizens as consumers. New Left Review, (76), 27-47.
Villacañas, J. L. (2015). Populismo. La Huerta Grande.
Zizek, S. (2006). Against the Populist Temptation. Critical Inquiry, 3(3), 551-574. https://doi.org/10.1086/505378 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/505378