From the world to Good Life: Changes and continuity in Arthur Schopenhauer's ethical proposal
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Arthur Schopenhauer, the great pessimist in the history of philosophy, is at the same time the precursor of the recent renaissance of a philosophy focused on the question of a happy life. His Aphorisms on the Wisdom of Life seem to be in direct contradiction with the key position of his magnum opus, The World as Will and Representation, in which he declared the impossibility of working on character and the incompatibility between the world as will and representation with our desire to be happy. This article seeks to reestablish the unity of his work beyond this apparent contradiction, in order to reevaluate his contribution to the philosophy of Good Life. Despite (or perhaps because of) his pessimism, Schopenhauer's contribution can provide an important relativization to this branch of contemporary philosophy, threatened by an overvaluation of happiness and the malleability of our lives. Thus, recognizing one of the founders of contemporary philosophy of Good Life implies saving him from his own criticism, as well as remembering an important critique of the philosophy that seeks to make happiness attainable for everyone.
Article Details
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The Revista de Filosofía UCSC is an open access journal and does not charge for publication. In addition, it regulates its Copyright and access policy according to the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International Public License (CC BY-NC 4.0), therefore sharing (reproducing and distributing the material in any medium or format) and adaptation (modifying, transforming, and creating from the material) is allowed as long as proper credit is given and the citation is included with the corresponding data. Moreover, it is not allowed to use the material for commercial purposes.
How to Cite
References
Aristóteles, Ética Nicomámquea – Ética Eudemia, Editorial Gredos: Madrid, 1993.
De Botton, A., The Consolations of Philosophy, Penguin Books: London, 2000.
Dohmen, J. (Ed.), Over levenskunst; de grote filosofen over het goede leven, Ambo: Amsterdam, 2002.
Epicuro, “Carta a Meneceo. Noticia, traducción y notas de Pablo Oyarzún R”. En Onomazein 4; pp. 403-425.
Mann, T., “Schopenhauer”. En: Schopenhauer, Nietzsche, Freud, Alianza: Madrid, 2000, pp. 17-82.
Hadot, P., Exercices spirituels et philosophie Antique. Éditions Albin Michel: Paris, 2002.
Kant, I., Fundamentación de la metafísica de las costumbres, Mare Nostrum Comunicación: Madrid, 2000
Kekes, J., The Art of Life, Cornell University Press: Ithaca/London, 2002.
Nehamas, A., The Art of Living, University of California Press: Berkeley, 1998.
Nietzsche, F., El origen de la tragedia a partir del espíritu de la música, Goncourt: Buenos Aires, 1978.
Nietzsche, F., Consideraciones intempestivas, Alianza: Buenos Aires, 2002.
Philonenko, A., Schopenhauer; Una filosofía de la tragedia, Editorial Anthropos: Barcelona, 1989.
Platón, Diálogos IV: República, Editorial Gredos: Madrid, 1988.
Safranski, R., Schopenhauer y los años salvajes de la filosofía, Alianza Editorial: Madrid, 1991.
Schopenhauer, A., El mundo como voluntad y representación (2 volúmenes). Editorial Trotta: Madrid, 2003.
Schopenhauer, A., Parerga y Paralipómena (2 volúmenes), Editorial Trotta: Madrid, 2009.
Solé, J., Schopenhauer; El pesimismo se hace filosofía, Batiscafo: (s.l.), 2015.
Young, J., Schopenhauer, Routledge: London/New York, 2005.