The Sense of Anarchy and the Anarchy of Sense in Richir and Deleuze

Main Article Content

Alexander Schnell
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6596-2858
Angela Alarcón-Alvear
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6662-7901

Abstract

This article compares the philosophies of Marc Richir and Gilles Deleuze through the notions of “anarchy” and “sense,” exploring how these transform classical phenomenology. It argues that both authors replace the traditional focus on the subject with a phenomenology of Sinnbildung or “sense-in-the-making.” Richir radicalizes the phenomenological epoché toward a generative contingency, while Deleuze develops a science of surface effects rooted in concept creation and the simulacrum. Both propose a dynamic “self,” detached from traditional subjectivity, and articulate the link between interiority and exteriority in sense-making processes. This work shows how Richir and Deleuze destabilize subjective foundations, proposing an anarchic phenomenology that redefines the relationship between appearance, simulacrum, and sense production.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Article Details

How to Cite
Schnell, A., & Alarcón-Alvear, A. (2024). The Sense of Anarchy and the Anarchy of Sense in Richir and Deleuze. Revista De Filosofia UCSC, 23(2), 46–63. https://doi.org/10.21703/2735-6353.2024.23.2.2977
Section
Articles
Author Biographies

Alexander Schnell, Bergische Universität

Alexander Schnell is a professor of theoretical philosophy and phenomenology at the University of Wuppertal. He directs the Institute for Transcendental Philosophy and Phenomenology (ITP), the International Fichte Research Center (IFF), the Eugen Fink Center Wuppertal (EFZW), the Marc Richir Archive (MRA), and the Archive for Phenomenological Research (APF).

Angela Alarcón-Alvear, Universidad Católica de la Santísima Concepción

Master's degree in Didactics of Religious Education from Finis Terrae University (Chile). Master's degree in Biblical Studies from the International University of La Rioja (Spain). Bachelor's degree in Religious Sciences and Ecclesiastical Studies, as well as a Bachelor's degree in Education from the Catholic University of the Santísima Concepción (Chile). Assistant lecturer in the Department of Theology at the Faculty of Theological and Philosophical Studies.

References

Barthes, R. (1964). Essais critiques. Éditions du Seuil.

Deleuze, G. (1969). Logique du sens. Éditions de Minuit.

Deleuze, G. (2003). L’immanence: une vie… En D. Lapoujade (Ed.), Deux régimes de fous. Textes et entretiens 1975-1995 (pp. 359-363). Éditions de Minuit.

Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1991). Qu’est-ce que la philosophie?. Éditions de Minuit.

Descartes, R. (1973). Les principes de la philosophie. En F. Alquié (Ed.), Œuvres philosophiques, tome III (pp. 95). Garnier.

Derrida, J. (1990). Le Problème de la genèse dans la philosophie de Husserl. PUF.

Fichte, J. G. (1795). Grundriss des eigentümlichen der Wissenschaftslehre in Rücksicht auf das theoretische Vermögen. (GA I, Vol. 3).

Fink, E. (2018). Sein, Wahrheit, Welt. Vor-Fragen zum Problem des Phänomen-Begriffs. En V. Cesarone (Ed.), Sein, Wahrheit, Welt (EFGA 6, pp. 301-327). Karl Alber.

Forestier, F. (2014, 7 de noviembre). Le multiple et la pluralité - autour de Deleuze et Richir. Strass de la Philosophie. http://strassdelaphilosophie.blogspot.com/2014/11/le-multiple-et-la-pluralite-autour-de.html

Husserl, E. (1976a). Die Krisis der europäischen Wissenschaften und die transzendentale Phänomenologie. Eine Einleitung in die phänomenologische Philosophie (Hua VI). (W. Biemel, Ed.). M. Nijhoff.

Husserl, E. (1976b). Ideen zu einer reinen Phänomenologie und phänomenologischen Philosophie. Erstes Buch. Allgemeine Einführung in die reine Phänomenologie. (Hua III/I). (K. Schuhmann, Ed.). M. Nijhoff.

Nietzsche, F. (1988). Nachgelassene Fragmente 1884-1885 (G. Colli & M. Montinari, Eds.). Gruyter.

Richir, M. (1970). Le Rien enroulé - Esquisse d’une pensée de la phénoménalisation. Textures, 70/7.8.

Richir, M. (1981). Recherches phénoménologiques (I, II, III). Fondation pour la phénoménologie transcendantale. Ousia.

Richir, M. (1992). Méditations phénoménologiques. Phénoménologie et phénoménologie du langage. J. Millon.

Richir, M. (2006). Fragments phénoménologiques sur le temps et l’espace. J. Millon.

Richir, M. (2010). Variations sur le sublime et le. J. Millon.

Schnell, A. (2011). Le sens se faisant. Marc Richir et la refondation de la phénoménologie transcendantale. Ousia.

Schnell, A. (2015). La déhiscence du sens. Hermann.