The equivalence of dispositio seu conatus in Spinoza's Ethics: A reflection on the role of disposition and effort in the determination of the good.
Main Article Content
Abstract
This article explores the complex relationship between the concepts of conatus and disposition in Spinoza's Ethics and their role in shaping the understanding of "goodness." While conatus—the effort of each being to persevere in existence—has been widely studied, the notion of disposition, which refers to an individual's capacity to be affected and to affect others, has received less scholarly attention. This study addresses this gap by examining how conatus and disposition mutually determine each other, highlighting their importance in defining what is considered "good" within Spinoza's ethical framework. By focusing on propositions 38 and 39 of Part IV of the Ethics, the article shows that the relationship between disposition and conatus is central to understanding Spinoza's philosophy. The preservation of a body's motion and rest, which allows it to be affected in various ways, is seen as "good" because it enhances the mind's ability to understand. This interplay between conatus and disposition plays a key role in Spinoza's concept of virtue and ethical reasoning. The findings suggest that disposition is crucial not only for the preservation and enhancement of the body and mind but also for addressing the mind-body relationship in Spinoza's thought. This study provides a fresh perspective on the dynamic interaction between conatus and disposition, offering new insights into their broader implications within Spinoza's philosophical system and opening possibilities for further research.
Downloads
Metrics
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The Revista de Filosofía UCSC is an open access journal and does not charge for publication. In addition, it regulates its Copyright and access policy according to the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International Public License (CC BY-NC 4.0), therefore sharing (reproducing and distributing the material in any medium or format) and adaptation (modifying, transforming, and creating from the material) is allowed as long as proper credit is given and the citation is included with the corresponding data. Moreover, it is not allowed to use the material for commercial purposes.
References
Garrett, D. (1999). Teleology in Spinoza and Early Modern Rationalism. En R. J. Gennaro et C. Huenemann (eds.) New Essays on the Rationalists, Oxford University Press, 310-335.
Garrett, D. (2002). Spinoza’s Conatus Argument. En J. Biro (ed.), Spinoza. Metaphysical Themes, Oxford University Press, 127-158.
Gebhart, C. (1925). Spinoza Opera. Carl Winter.
Lantoine, J.-L. (2016). L’agent automate. Le concept de disposition chez Spinoza. Thèse de Doctorat de l'Université de Lyon, École Normale Supérieure de Lyon.
Moreau, P.-F. (2007). L’amnésie du poète espagnol. Klesis – revue philosophique: autour de François Zourabichvili, 5 (1). 1 - 16.
Sangiacomo, A. (2013). L’essenza del corpo. Spinoza e la scienza delle composizioni, Olms.
Spinoza, B. (1958). Ética demostrada según el orden geométrico (Traducción: Óscar Cohan). F.C.E.
Viljanen, V. (2011). Spinoza’s Geometry of Power. Cambridge University Press.
Wolfson, H. A. (1934). The Philosophy of Spinoza. Schocken.
Zourabichvili, F. (2014). Spinoza. Una física del pensamiento. Cactus.