The Responsibility in Paul Ricoeur
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The present study aims to analyze the term ‘responsibility’ in P. Ricoeur. We say ‘term’ in the strong sense of the word, because our research develops a treatment of it from the philosophy of action as conceived by Ricoeur, with a notorious analytical imprint, to progressively reach the study of responsibility under a moral plane. Thus we will first review the notion of agent and its relation to action; Secondly, we will deal with the intention-action relationship in order to obtain the notion of responsibility in terms of the philosophy of action; And we will end with an approach to the responsibility considered from the philosophy of action towards ethics.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The Revista de Filosofía UCSC is an open access journal and does not charge for publication. In addition, it regulates its Copyright and access policy according to the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International Public License (CC BY-NC 4.0), therefore sharing (reproducing and distributing the material in any medium or format) and adaptation (modifying, transforming, and creating from the material) is allowed as long as proper credit is given and the citation is included with the corresponding data. Moreover, it is not allowed to use the material for commercial purposes.
References
Agís, M. (2011): Conocimiento y razón práctica. Un recorrido por la filosofía de Paul
Ricoeur. Madrid, España: Fundación Emmanuel Mounier.
Anscombe, G. E. M. (1991): Intención. Madrid, España: Paidos.
Austin, J.L. (1972): “Alegato en pro de las excusas”, El lenguaje común. Ensayos de
filosofía analítica. Madrid, España: Tecnos, pp. 58-83 [Publicado originalmente en
“Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, New Series, Vol. 57 (1956 - 1957), pp. 1-30].
Danto, A.C. (1965): “Basics Actions”, American Philosophical Quaterly, Pittsburgh (2),
N 2, pp. 141-143.
Feinberg, J. (1974): “Action and Responsibility”, Doing and Deserving. Essays in the
theory of responsability. Princeton, EE.UU, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Ferrer, Santos (2005): “La articulación entre los discursos de la acción en Ricoeur”,
Revista Investigaciones fenomenológicas, N 4, pp. 147 – 166.
Goldman, A. (2015): A theory of human action. Princeton, EE.UU, New Jersey: Princeton
Legacy Library.
Hart, H. L. A. (1948 - 1949): “The Ascription of Responsibility and Rights”, Proceedings
of the Aristotelian Society, New Series, Vol. 49, pp. 171-194.
Heidegger, M. (2009): Ser y tiempo. Madrid, España: Trotta.
Martínez Sánchez A. (2000): “La filosofía de la acción de Paul Ricoeur”, Revista
ISEGORÍA. Revista de filosofía moral y política, N 22, pp. 207 -227.
Pitcher, G. (1960): “Hart on Action and Responsibility”, The Philosophical Review, Vol.
, No. 2, Apr, pp. 226-235.
Ricoeur, P. (1981): El discurso de la acción. Madrid, España: Cátedra.
____________(2003): “El concepto de responsabilidad. Ensayo de un análisis semántico”,
Lo justo. Madrid, España: Caparros editores, pp. 49 – 74.
____________(2013a): Sí mismo como otro. Madrid, España: Siglo XXI.
____________(2013b): Caminos del reconocimiento. Tres estudios. Ciudad de México, México: F.C.E.
Strawson, P. F. (1959): Individuals: An Essay in Descriptive Metaphysics. Londres,
Inglaterra: Methuen.
Wittgenstein, L. (1999): Investigaciones filosóficas. Madrid, España: Altaya.