Notes on the (bio)ethical state of human enhancement technologies
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This reflection analyzes the bioethical aspects inherent to human enhancement technologies (TMH), which refer to the ethical implications of genetic intervention, biochemical transformation, and technological modification of the body and brain. To achieve this objective, first, the problem of "emotional illiteracy" is raised, a concept coined by Günter Anders that is used to highlight the difficulty in reflecting on technology in general and human enhancement technologies in particular. Secondly, the key issues in dispute related to TMH are identified, and the main arguments presented by both the proponents (transhumanists) and their critics (conservationists) are reconstructed. Thirdly, the ethical limits of using TMH are questioned, and finally, an analysis is provided on the extent of the moral duty to intervene technologically (TMH) in cases such as the era of socio-environmental crises.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The Revista de Filosofía UCSC is an open access journal and does not charge for publication. In addition, it regulates its Copyright and access policy according to the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International Public License (CC BY-NC 4.0), therefore sharing (reproducing and distributing the material in any medium or format) and adaptation (modifying, transforming, and creating from the material) is allowed as long as proper credit is given and the citation is included with the corresponding data. Moreover, it is not allowed to use the material for commercial purposes.
References
Anders, G. (2001). Nosotros, los hijos de Eichmann. Paidós.
Anders, G. (2011a). La obsolescencia del hombre, Sobre el alma en la época de la segunda revolución industrial. Volumen I. Pre-textos.
Anders, G. (2011b). La obsolescencia del hombre, Sobre la destrucción de la vida en la época de la tercera revolución industrial. Volumen II. Pre-textos.
Anders, G. (2021). El piloto de Hiroshima. Paidós.
Barriopedro, D. et. al. (2011). The Hot Summer of 2010. Redrawing the Temperature Record Map of Europe. Science, 332, 220. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1126/science.1201224
Bijker, W. E., Pinch, T. L. (1984). The social construction of facts and artefacts: Or how the sociology of science and the sociology of technology might benefit each other. Social Studies of Science, 14(3), 399- 441.
Campillo, A. (2001). El gran experimento. Ensayos sobre la sociedad global. Los libros de la catarata.
Caplan, A. (2017). ¿Bueno, mejor o lo mejor? En Bostrom, N. y Savulescu, J. (eds), Mejoramiento humano (pp. 209- 220). Teell,
Coeckelbergh, M. (2021). Ética de la inteligencia artificial. Cátedra.
Cooper, M. (2008). Life as Surplus. Biotechnology & Capitalism in the Neoliberal Era. University of Washington Press.
Cortina, A. (2019). ¿Para qué sirve realmente…? La ética. Paidós.
Crutzen, P. and Stoermer, E. (2000). The ‘Anthropocene’. Global Change Newsletter, 41, 17-18.
Crutzen P. J. (2002). Geology of mankind. Nature, 415(6867), 23. https://doi.org/10.1038/415023a
DeLashmuntt, M. W. (2006). Perspectives on techno- science and human nature. Zygon: Journal of Religion & Science, 41(2), 267- 287.
Diéguez, A. (2017). Transhumanismo. La búsqueda tecnológica del mejoramiento humano. Herder.
Elliott, C. (2003). Humanity 2.0. Wilson Quarterly, 27(4), 13-20.
Ertz, Marie-Pravin. (2016). Le transhumanisme, un imaginaire humain, trop humain ? Universitaires Européennes.
Fraser, P. (2018a). Intelligence artificielle. Ľultime bricolage informatique. Éditions V/F.
Fraser, P. (2018b). Transhumanisme. Au- delà du corps. Éditions V/F.
Fraser, P. (2018c). Tecnologies numériques. La mise en réseau de Ľindividu. Éditions V/F.
Frodeman, R. (2006). Nanotechnology: visible and the invisible. Science as Culture, 15(4), 383-389.
Fukuyama, F. (2002). Our posthuman future: Consequences of the biotechnology revolution. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Graham, E. (2006). In whose image? Representations of technology and the ʻendʼ of humanity. Ecotheology, 11 (2), 159-182.
Habermas, J. (2003). The future of human nature. Blackwell Publishing.
Hall, M. (2017). The Bioethics of Enhancement. Transhumanism, Disability, and Biopolitics. Lexington Books.
Harari, N (2017). Homo Deus. Breve historia del mañana. Debate.
Heidegger, M. (1994). Serenidad. Gelassenheit. Ediciones del Serbal.
Heidegger, M. (2019). Filosofía, ciencia y técnica. Universitaria.
Hopkins, P. (2013b). Is Enhancement Worthy of Being a Right? En More, Max and Vita- More, Natasha. The Transhumanist Reader. Classical and Contemporary Essays on the Science, Technology, and Philosophy of the Human Future. Malden (345-354). Wiley Blackwell.
Hughes, J. (2004). Citizen cyborg: Why democratic societies must respond to the redesigned human of the future. Westview Press.
Hughes, J. (2013d). En More, Max and Vita- More, Natasha. The Transhumanist Reader. Classical and Contemporary Essays on the Science, Technology, and Philosophy of the Human Future. (227-233). Wiley Blackwell.
Huxley, J. (1957). New bottles for new wine. Chatto & Windus.
James, W. (2009). Un universo pluralista. Filosofía de la experiencia. Cactus.
Jonas, H. (1995). Principio de responsabilidad. Ensayo de una ética para la civilización tecnológica. Herder.
Junker- Kenny, M. (2005). Genetic enhancement as care or as domination? The ethics of asymmetrical relationships in the upbringing of children. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 39(1), 1- 17.
Jousset-Couturier (2016). Le transhumanisme. Faut-il avoir peur de l'avenir? Eyrolles.
Lilley, S. (2013). Transhumanism and Society. Introduction to the Transhumanity Debate. The Social Debate Over Human Enhancement. Springer Netherlands. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4981-8_1
Livingstone, D. (2015). Transhumanism. The History of a Dangerous Idea. Sabilillah.
Manzocco, R. (2019). Transhumanism. Engineering the Human Condition. History, Philosophy and Current Status. Springer.
McKibben, B. (2003). Enough: Staying human in an engineered age. Henry Holt and Company
McMichael, et. al. (1996). World Health Organization. Office of Global and Integrated Environmental Health. et al. Climate change and human health: an assessment prepared by a Task Group on behalf of the World Health Organization, the World Meteorological Association and the United Nations Environment Programme. World Health Organization. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/62989
Mendiola, I. (2006). El jardín biotecnológico. Tecnociencia, transgénicos y biopolítica. Los libros de la Catarata.
Miller, M. et. Al. (2013d). The Open Society and Its Media. En More, Max and Vita- More, Natasha (eds). The Transhumanist Reader. Classical and Contemporary Essays on the Science, Technology, and Philosophy of the Human Future (268-277). Wiley Blackwell,.
More, M. (2013a). The Philosophy of Transhumanism. En More, Max and Vita- More, Natasha (eds). The Transhumanist Reader. Classical and Contemporary Essays on the Science, Technology, and Philosophy of the Human Future (3-17). Wiley Blackwell.
Naam, R. (2010). More than human. Embracing the promise of biological enhancement. Random House.
Ortega y Gasset, J. (2017). La Rebelión de las masas (1926-1931). En Obras Completas, Tomo IV. Taurus.
Padgett, A. G. (2005). God versus technology? Science, secularity, and the theology of technology. Zygon: Journal of Religion & Science, 40(3), 577-584.
Parens, E. (2017c). Hacia un debate más fructífero sobre el mejoramiento. En Bostrom, N., y Savulescu, J. (eds). Mejoramiento humano (191-208) Tell.
Persson, I. & Savulescu, J. (2020). ¿Preparados para el futuro? La necesidad del mejoramiento moral. Teell.
Ruiz, P. (2020). Ética de las nanotecnologías. Herder.
Russo, S., et. al. (2014). Magnitude of extreme heat waves in present climate and their projection in a warming world. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 119, 12,500–12,512. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD022098
Sandel, M. (2017a). Contra la perfección: lo que pasa con los niños de diseño, los atletas biónicos y la ingeniería genética. En Bostrom, N., y Savulescu, J. (eds). Mejoramiento humano (75-94). Tell.
Savulescu, J. (2017b). El prejuicio humano y el estatus moral de los deberes mejorados: ¿qué les debemos a los dioses? En Bostrom, N., y Savulescu, J. (eds) Mejoramiento humano (221- 259). Tell.
Sloterdijk, P. (2006). El hombre operable. Revista Observaciones Filosóficas Antropología. Recuperado de: https://www.observacionesfilosoficas.net/download/hombreoperable.pdf
Sloterdijk, P. (2018). ¿Qué sucedió en el siglo XX? Siruela.
Transhumanist Declaration (2012). En More, Max and Vita- More, Natasha. (eds). The Transhumanist Reader. Classical and Contemporary Essays on the Science, Technology, and Philosophy of the Human Future (54-55). Wiley Blackwell,
Toscano López, Daniel (2022). El Dispositivo Biopolítico de mejoramiento humano del siglo XXI: poder molecular sobre la vida y producción de nuevas subjetividades. Revista De Filosofía Aurora, 34(61). https://doi.org/10.7213/1980-5934.34.061.DS12
Vandenbergue, F. (2006). Complexités du posthumanisme. Trois essays dialectiques sur la sociologie de Bruno Latour. Ľ Harmattan.
Vandentorren, S., Suzan, F., Medina, S., et al. (2004) Mortality in 13 French Cities during the August 2003 Heat Wave. American Journal of Public Health, 94, 1518-1520. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.94.9.1518
Vattino, G. (2010). Il Transumanesimo. Una nuova filosofia per l'Uomo del XXI secolo. Armando.
Vigne, V. (2013c). Technological Singularity, En More, Max and Vita- More, Natasha (eds) The Transhumanist Reader. Classical and Contemporary Essays on the Science, Technology, and Philosophy of the Human Future (365-375). Wiley Blackwell.
World Transhumanist Association, (2021). Humanity+. https://humanityplus.org/ Consultado el 07 abril de 2021.