Institution of a conceptless eidetics
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The article argues that phenomenology is not merely a descriptive method, but rather an inversion of the philosophical order: it submits being to the test of appearing. The tension that guides our argument does not simply oppose essence and phenomenon but rather concerns two internal demands of phenomenology: on the one hand, the need to recognize invariants or directions of sense; on the other, the unfinished, horizontal, and variable openness of all appearing. Within this framework, the article maintains that this tension is not resolved by abandoning essence, but by elaborating an eidetics of appearing, in which the essential does not function as a logical universal, but as an operative structure immanent to phenomenality. The text takes Marc Richir and his proposal of an “eidetics without concepts” as its central axis, reading it through the problem of institution, whereby sense is stabilized, transmitted, and made available for reactivation, without being closed off in a conceptual definition. The counterpoint with Merleau-Ponty makes it possible to clarify both the scope of institution and its limit: Richir does not simply extend an ontology of the lived world but introduces an architectonic rupture between phenomenality and the institution of sense.
Article Details
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The Revista de Filosofía UCSC is an open access journal and does not charge for publication. In addition, it regulates its Copyright and access policy according to the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International Public License (CC BY-NC 4.0), therefore sharing (reproducing and distributing the material in any medium or format) and adaptation (modifying, transforming, and creating from the material) is allowed as long as proper credit is given and the citation is included with the corresponding data. Moreover, it is not allowed to use the material for commercial purposes.
How to Cite
References
Aristóteles. (1994). Metafísica. Gredos.
Barbaras, R. (2011). La phénoménologie comme dynamique de la manifestation. Les Études philosophiques, 98(3), 331–349. https://doi.org/10.3917/leph.113.0331
de Saint-Aubert, E. (2006). Vers une ontologie indirecte: sources et enjeux critiques de l’appel à l’ontologie chez Merleau-Ponty. Vrin.
Husserl, E. (1986). Meditaciones cartesianas. Introducción a la fenomenología trascendental. Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Husserl, E. (1991). La crisis de las ciencias europeas y la fenomenología trascendental. Crítica.
Husserl, E. (2002). Lecciones de fenomenología de la conciencia interna del tiempo. Trotta.
Husserl, E. (2004). Análisis de la síntesis pasiva. Lecciones y manuscritos sobre la teoría de la pasividad. Trotta.
Husserl, E. (2013). Ideas relativas a una fenomenología pura y una filosofía fenomenológica. Libro primero: Introducción general a la fenomenología pura (trad. A. Zirión Quijano). Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1945). Phénoménologie de la perception. PUF.
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1964a). Le visible et l’invisible. Gallimard.
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1964b). L’Œil et l’Esprit. Gallimard.
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1968). Résumés de cours. Collège de France (1952-1960). Gallimard.
Merleau-Ponty, M. (2003). L’institution, la passivité. Notes de cours au Collège de France (1954-1955). Belin.
Patočka, J. (1988). Qu’est-ce que la phénoménologie? Millon.
Platón. (1986). República. Gredos.
Richir, M. (1982). Le sens de la phénoménologie dans Le visible et l’invisible. Esprit, (6), 124–145.
Richir, M. (1987). Phénomènes, temps et êtres. Ontologie et phénoménologie. Jérôme Millon.
Richir, M. (1988). Phénoménologie et institution symbolique. Phénomènes, temps et êtres II. Jérôme Millon.
Richir, M. (1992). Méditations phénoménologiques. Phénoménologie et phénoménologie du langage. Jérôme Millon.
Richir, M. (1998). Qu’est-ce qu’un phénomène? Les Études philosophiques, (4), 435–449.
Richir, M. (2002). L’institution de l’idéalité. Des schématismes phénoménologiques. Association pour la promotion de la phénoménologie.
Sartre, J.-P. (1943). L’Être et le Néant. Essai d’ontologie phénoménologique. Gallimard.
Zahavi, D. (2025). Edmund Husserl. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2025/entries/husserl/