What animal sees
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This article attempts to explore and extend Etienne Bimbenet’s discontinuist intuition about the animal, positioning it within some traditional debates of contemporary French thought. By involving Merleau-Ponty, Deleuze, and Derrida, it aims to show the ethical and political consequences of the human-animal relationship and the risks posed by the use of antispeciesist tools in understanding this difference with the animal. Finally, the need to give credence to a discontinuist disposition will be demonstrated through a visual example that makes clear the danger of new and invisible forms of violence underlying any attempt to appropriate the vision of the animal.
Article Details
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The Revista de Filosofía UCSC is an open access journal and does not charge for publication. In addition, it regulates its Copyright and access policy according to the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International Public License (CC BY-NC 4.0), therefore sharing (reproducing and distributing the material in any medium or format) and adaptation (modifying, transforming, and creating from the material) is allowed as long as proper credit is given and the citation is included with the corresponding data. Moreover, it is not allowed to use the material for commercial purposes.
How to Cite
References
Alys, F. (2004). Nightwatch, cortometraje. Londres. Documental de libre acceso: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VqVJsfzYaD8.
Bailly, J.-C. (2013). Le parti pris des animaux. Christian Bourgois.
Baker, S. (2000). The Postmodern Animal. Reaktion.
Bimbenet, E. (2011). L’animal que je ne suis plus. Gallimard.
Burgat, F. (2006). Liberté et inquiétude de la vie animale. Kimé.
Caillois, R. (1987). Le mythe et l’homme. Gallimard.
Calarco, M. (2007). “Thinking through Animals: Reflections on the Ethical and Political Stakes of the Question of the Animal in Derrida”, en Oxford Literary Review, n. 29, pp 1-15.
lhem, G. (1992). “Le vivant et son milieu”, en La Connaissance de la vie.Vrin.
Carroll, L. (2005). A través del espejo y lo que Alicia encontró allí. Alianza.
Cavalieri, P. (2000). “Les droits de l’homme pour les grands singes non humains ?”, en Le Débat, n° 108, pp. 156-162.
Cimatti, F. (2020). Unbecoming human. Edinburgh University.
Deleuze, G. y Guattari, F. (2002). Mil mesetas. Capitalismo y esquizofrenia. Pre-Textos.
Derrida, J. (1989). La escritura y la diferencia. Anthropos.
Derrida, J. (2003). Papel Máquina. Trotta.
Derrida, J. (2008). El animal que luego estoy si(gui)endo. Trotta.
Derrida, J. (2010). Seminario. La bestia y el soberano, v. I (2001-2002). Manantial.
Derrida, J., Roudinesco, E. (2009). Y mañana, qué… Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Duchamp, M. (1980). Notes. Flammarion.
Ehrich, P. y Reed, J. (2020). My octopus teacher. Netflix.
Heráclito (2010). Textos, en G. Colli, La sabiduría griega. Trotta, pp. 17-132.
Llored, P. (2013). Jacques Derrida. Politique et éthique de l’animalité. Vrin.
Lowlor, L. (2008). “Following the Rats: Becoming Animal in Deleuze and Guattari”, en SubStance, n. 117, pp. 169-187.
Marrell, J. (2015). “The Animal Mirrors: The Human/Animal Divide in Derrida and Deleuze”, en Mosaic, n. 48, pp. 175-189.
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1995). La nature. Notes. Cours du collège de France. Seuil.
Merleau-Ponty, M. (2010). Lo visible y lo invisible. Nueva Visión.
Regan, T. (1983). The case for Animal Rights. University of California.
Schaeffer, J.-M. (2007). La Fin de l'exception humaine. Gallimard.
Simons, J. (2002). Animal Rights and the Politics of Literary Representation. Palgrave.
Singer, P. (1975). Animal Liberation. Ecco/Herper Collins.
Uexküll, J. (2001). Milieu animal et milieu humain. Payot & Rivages.
Wambocq, J. (2018). Thinking between Deleuze and Merleau-Ponty. Ohio University.