The call: from presence to manifestation. A reflection on the difference between metaphysics and phenomenology
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This work aims to demonstrate the decisive importance of the call and response as devices for the overcoming and reappropriation of metaphysics. Jean-Luc Marion shows that the call is present in metaphysics, although latently, in the ego persuasus (Descartes) and in respect (Kant). In order for it to manifest itself, a phenomenological response that recognises it is necessary. Although Husserl and Heidegger begin the phenomenological path thanks to the expansion of intuition and the implementation of reduction, they fail to access the ultimate and irreducible principle of givenness. To do this, it will be neccesary to recognise the call throuth the third phenomenological reduction, in which the call takes the initiative and summons the subject, must be carried out. This is how, recognising the call, the 'gifted' comes and responds through the redoubler/doubler: taking up the contents of metaphysics in a hermeneutic way in the light of the call.
Downloads
Metrics
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The Revista de Filosofía UCSC is an open access journal and does not charge for publication. In addition, it regulates its Copyright and access policy according to the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International Public License (CC BY-NC 4.0), therefore sharing (reproducing and distributing the material in any medium or format) and adaptation (modifying, transforming, and creating from the material) is allowed as long as proper credit is given and the citation is included with the corresponding data. Moreover, it is not allowed to use the material for commercial purposes.
References
Chrétien, J-L. (1992). L’appel et la réponse. Minuit.
De Lara, F. (2017). El primer Heidegger de Marion. Sobre el problema de la donación en las frühe Freiburger Vorlesungen. En Eric Pommier, La fenomenología de la donación de Jean-Luc Marion (pp. 117-128). Prometeo.
Descartes, R. (1974-1983) Oeuvres de Descartes, publiées par Charles Adam & Paul Tannery, nouvelle présentation en co-édition avec le Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, 11 vol. Vrin.
Descartes, R. (2011). Meditaciones metafísicas. Alianza. (Originalmente publicado en 1641.)
Heidegger, M. (1927). Sein und Zeit. Niemeyer.
Husserl, E. (1999). Investigaciones lógicas I. Alianza. (Originalmente publicado en 1900.)
Inverso, H. (2018). Fenomenología de lo inaparente. Prometeo.
Kant, I. (2003). Kritik der praktischen Vernunft. Herausgegeben von Horst D. Brandt & Heiner F. Klemme.
Marion, J.L. (1989). Réduction et donation. Recherches sur Husserl, Heidegger et la phénoménologie. PUF.
Marion, J.L. (1996). Questions cartésiennes II, sur l’ego et sur Dieu. PUF.
Marion, J.L. (1998). Étant donné. Essai d’une phenoménologie de la donation, seconde édition corrige. PUF.
Marion, J.L. (2003). Le phénomène érotique. Grasset.
Marion, J.L. (2015). Doubler la métaphysique. En AA. VV. PUF.
Marion, J.L. (2016). Doubler la métaphysique. Educação e Filosofia, 30 (Especial), pp. 19–39. https://doi.org/10.14393/REVEDFIL.issn.0102-6801.v30nEspeciala2016-p19a39
Marion, J.L. (2016). Reprise du donné. PUF.
Marion, J.L. (2020). Entrevista a Jean-Luc Marion. En Rodrigo Cárcamo Aguad, Filosofía en diálogo (pp. 127-123). Prometeo.
Marion, Jean-Luc. (2023). La métaphysique et après. Grasset
Pavan, C. (2020). La palabra que no dice nada y la palabra que es necesario interpretar. En Jorge Luis Roggero, El fenómeno saturado. La excedencia de la donación en la fenomenología de Jean-Luc Marion (139-149). SB.
Rodríguez García, R. (2019). La transformación hermenéutica de la fenomenología. UNSAM.
Roggero, J. (2019). Hermenéutica del amor. Sb.
Vinolo, S. (2019). Jean-Luc Marion. La fenomenología de la donación como relevo de la metafísica. Centro de Publicaciones PUCE.