Receiving a tradition as an expression of 'doubling metaphysics': Dionysian pragmatism and performativity in the language of saturation in Jean-Luc Marion

Main Article Content

Matias Pizzi
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2356-5958

Abstract

The main goal of the present work is to address the reception of Dionysius Areopagite´s Thought practiced by Jean-Luc Marion, concentrating, first of all, on his peculiar interpretation of Dionysian theology as a pragmatic and performative language, as it appears in his writing Le visible et le révélé (2005). There we will show how his appropriation of pragmatism finds two aspects: on the one hand, what we could call Dionysian pragmatism, and on the other hand, the discussion of it with the theory of Speech Acts by Austin and Searle. From all this is derived the conception of the erotic phenomenon and the expression “I love you” as a perlocutory act. Secondly, and in light of Marion's latest formulation of the phenomenology of donation as a doubler la métaphysique in his book La métaphysique et après (2023), we will argue that his reception of the Christian Neoplatonism of Dionysius the Areopagite as a language pragmatic and performative can be read as a paradigmatic case of this new position towards metaphysics.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Article Details

How to Cite
Pizzi, M. . (2024). Receiving a tradition as an expression of ’doubling metaphysics’: Dionysian pragmatism and performativity in the language of saturation in Jean-Luc Marion . Revista De Filosofia UCSC, 23(2), 301–314. https://doi.org/10.21703/2735-6353.2024.23.2.2680
Section
Dossier: The Status of Metaphysics in the Work of Jean-Luc Marion

References

Austin, J. (1962). How to Do Things with Words. Cambridge University Press.

D´Amico, C. (2019). “El poder de la imagen: aenigma, teúrgia y performatividad”. En Cuozzo, G., Dall´Igna, A., González Ríos, J., Molgaray, D., Venturelli, G. (eds.), Verbum et imago coincidunt. Il linguaggio come specchio vivo in Cusano (pp. 17-32). Mimesis.

Derrida, J. (1967). La voix et le phénomène. PUF.

Marion, J.-L. (2023a). La métaphysique et après. Grasset.

Marion, J.-L. (2023b), “Doubler la metaphysique”. Conferencia dictada en IV Jornadas Internacionales Jean-Luc Marion: “La metafísica como problema”.

Marion, J.-L. (2013a). Étant donné. Essai d´une phénoménologie de la donation. PUF.

Marion, J.-L. (2013b). L´Idole et la distance. “Cinq études”. Grasset & Fasquelle.

Marion, J.-L. (2010). Le visible et le révélé. Cerf.

Marion, J.-L. (2001). De surcroît : études sur les phénomènes saturés. PUF.

Peirce, C. S. (1978). Lecciones sobre el pragmatismo. Aguilar.

Pizzi, M. (2023). Neoplatonismo agustiniano y neoplatonismo dionisiano en Jean-Luc Marion: aportes para un sincretismo fenomenológico. Patristica et Mediaevalia, 42 (2), 23-36. https://doi.org/10.34096/petm.v44.n2.13096

Pizzi, M. (2023). Lenguajes del exceso en la nouvelle phénoménologie française: Jean-Luc Marion y Claude Romano. Logos. Anales del Seminario de Metafísica, 56 (1), 83-103. https://doi.org/10.5209/ASEM

Pizzi, M. (2022). “Fenomenología y metafísica en Jean-Luc Marion”. En Bauschwitz, F., Pellejero, E., Moreira, G., (eds.). O Habitar e Inabitual (pp. 176-188). UFRN.

Potestá, A. (2017). “El don sin el ser. La dispusta entre Marion y Derrida”. En Pommier, E. (comp.), La fenomenología de la donación de Jean-Luc Marion (pp. 141-153). Prometeo.

Rorty, R. (1997). ¿Esperanza o conocimiento? Una introducción al pragmatismo. FCE.

Searle, J. (1969). Speech Acts. An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge University Press.