Myth and tradition: Two components of the historical tale. An analisis guided by the studies of L. Duch and J. Huizinga.

Main Article Content

Joel Isaac Román Negroni
Roberto Emmanuel González Quiñones

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to create a dialogue between two recognized authors in both philosophical and anthropological affairs: Lluís Duch and Johan Huizinga. Duch postulates a reflection of the existence itself following the linguistics and morphological elements used by the Ancient Greeks to explain and to argue the complexities of the human condition: mythos and logos. In this paper we want to examine this thesis defended by Duch, and to applicate it to the study of history. If history, understood as story of the past, is a man’s creation, then is a logical consequence that history has an important mythological element. To make this statement plausible, we have to study the philological bases of mythos and logos. In second place, we have to approach to the topic of history -following primarily J. Huizinga- as the spiritual product by which a generation “give account of their past”. At the conclusion of our work, we are going to prove that the history of any place or time has itself an important mythological element that, instead of being depreciated, claims for a special attention of philosophers, anthropologists and historians.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Román Negroni, J. I., & González Quiñones, R. E. (2023). Myth and tradition: Two components of the historical tale. An analisis guided by the studies of L. Duch and J. Huizinga. Revista De Filosofia UCSC, 16(2). Retrieved from https://revistas.ucsc.cl/index.php/revistafilosofia/article/view/2299
Section
Articles
Author Biographies

Joel Isaac Román Negroni, Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana

-

Roberto Emmanuel González Quiñones, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile

-

References

Arvea, A. (1999). "¿Por qué estudiamos latín?" en Onomazein, no. 4, 371–379.Campbell, J. (2014). En la búsqueda de la felicidad: mitología y transformación personal. (D. Kudler, Ed., D. González Raga & F. Mora, Trads.). Barcelona: Kairos.Castoriadis, Cornelius. (2006). Lo que hace a Grecia: de Homero a Heráclito. La creación humana II (T. Arijón, Trad.). Argentina: Fondo de Cultura Económica. Duch, L. (2002). Mito, interpretación y cultura. Barcelona: Herder.Ferro Bayona, J. (2015). El mito de la filosofía. Colombia: Universidad del Norte.Glare, P. G. W. (1990). Oxford Latin Dictionary. Oxford Latin Dictionary. Oxford: The Clarendon Press.Graves, Robert. (1985). Los mitos griegos I. (L. Echávarri, Trad.). Madrid: Editorial Alianza. Huizinga, J. (1977). El concepto de la historia. (W. Roces, Trad.) (Primera edición, 1946, reimpresión 1977). México D.F.: Fondo de Cultura Económica.Jaeger, W. (1943). Paideia: the Ideals of Greek Culture. (G. Highet, Trad.) (Vols. 1–3). New York: Oxford University Press.Kerényi, K. (1964). Griechische Grundbegriffe, Fragen und Antworten aus der heutigen Situation. Zürich.Lidell, H. G., & Scott, R. (1996). Greek-English Lexicon With a Revised Supplement. Greek-English Lexicon With a Revised Supplement. Oxford: The Clarendon Press.López Pérez, R. (2012). "El mito griego con razón. Homero y Hesíodo en el origen de la filosofía" en Medicina y Humanidades, no. 4, 61