Towards a theological-political critique of Silicon Valley's worldview

Main Article Content

Cristina Andrea Sereni
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5043-0258

Abstract

Among the dominant narratives that form the ideological substrate of global processes, we can identify powerful mythologies of determinist and substantivist technology. An example is the Silicon Valley worldview as a producer and exporter of a political theology that proposes that the imminent civilizational crisis will find a technical solution. This worldview has colonized everyday life in the world. Various critical currents have situated the substantivist-determinist narrative in the context of an intellectual history linked to political theology as a conceptual framework that gives meaning to various aspects of this narrative, whose main function is legitimation. This is also the main function of political theology. Therefore, Carl Schmitt's sociology of concepts allows us to identify the contradictions present within these contemporary narratives. Political theology, seen as the study of the structures and sources of political legitimacy, opens the doors to elucidate the power of domination that the Silicon Valley worldview exercises and to understand it as a political theology whose fundamental characteristic is its invisibility, which is proportional to its power of domination.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Sereni, C. A. (2019). Towards a theological-political critique of Silicon Valley’s worldview. Revista De Filosofia UCSC, 18(2), 93–109. https://doi.org/10.21703/2735-6353.2019.18.02.0005
Section
Articles
Author Biography

Cristina Andrea Sereni, CONICET - CITECDE, Universidad Nacional de Río Negro San Carlos de Bariloche, ARGENTINA

CONICET - CITECDE, Universidad Nacional de Río Negro San Carlos de Bariloche, ARGENTINA.

References

Agamben, G. (2012): Teología y lenguaje, Buenos Aires: Las Cuarenta.

Arendt, H. (1958): The Human Condition, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Baskin, J. (2015): ‘Paradigm Dressed as Epoch: The Ideology of the Anthropocene’, Environmental Values, 24, pp. 9-29.

Bostrom, N. (2003): “Human genetic enhancements: A transhumanist perspective”, The Journal of Value Inquiry, 37, pp. 493-506.

Braidotti, R. (2013): The Posthuman, Cambridge: Polity Press.

Cera, A. (2017): ‘The Technocene or Technology as (Neo)Environment’, Techné”, Research in Philosophy and Technology, 21, pp. 243-281.

Han, B. (2014): Psicopolítica, Barcelona: Herder.

Han, B. (2016): Topología de la violencia, Barcelona: Herder.

De Bonald, L. G. A. (1823): Ensayo analítico acerca de las leyes naturales del orden social o del poder, del ministro y del súbdito en la sociedad, Madrid: Imprenta Real.

Etzkowitz, H. et. al. (2000): “The future of the university and the university of the future: evolution of ivory tower to entrepreneurial paradigm”, Research Policy, 29, pp. 313–330.

Ferkiss, V. (1969): Technological Man: The myth and the reality, New York: Mentor Book.

Grant, G. (1995): Time as History, Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

Harari, Y. (2018): Homo Deus. A Brief History of Tomorrow, New York: Harper.

Hefner, Ph. (2009): “The animal that aspires to be an angel: The challenge of transhumanism”, Dialog: A Journal of Theology, 48, pp. 158-167.

Hayles, K. (1999): How we became Posthuman: Virtual bodies in cybernetic, literature, and informatics, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Heidegger, M. (1953): “Die Frage nach der Technik”, in 2000, Martin Heidegger Vorträge und Aufsätze. Gesamtausgabe Band 7: Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann, pp. 5-36.

Hui, Y. (2017): “On Cosmotechnics: For a Renewed Relation between Technology and Nature in the Anthropocene”, Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology, 21, pp. 319-341.

Kelly, K. (2010): What technology wants, New York: Viking Press.

Kurzweil, R. (2005): The Singularity is near: When humans transcend biology, New York: Viking Press.

Kotsko, A. (2018): Neoliberalism’s Demons. On the Political Theology of Late Capital, Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Lam, A. (2010): “From ‘Ivory Tower Traditionalists’ to ‘Entrepreneurial Scientists’?: Academic Scientists in Fuzzy University - Industry Boundaries”, Social Studies of Science, 40, pp. 307-340.

Ludueña Romandini, F. (2010): Antropotecnia. La comunidad de los espectros I, Buenos Aires: Miño y Dávila.

___________________ (2018): Arcana Imperii. Tratado metafísico-político. La comunidad de los espectros III, Buenos Aires: Miño y Dávila.

Lutz, C., White, G. (1986): “The anthropology of emotions”, Annual Review of Anthropology, 15, pp. 405-436.

More, M. (2009): A Letter To Mother Nature: Amendments To The Human Constitution, http://strategicphilosophy.blogspot.com/2009/05/its-about-ten­years-since-i-wrote.html (consulta 2 de agosto de 2019).

Morozov, E. (2016): La locura del solucionismo tecnológico, Madrid: Katz Editores.

Sadin, E. (2018): La silicolonización del mundo. La irresistible expansión del liberalismo digital, Buenos Aires: Caja Negra Editora.

Scattola, M. (2008): Teología política. Léxico de política, Barcelona: Ediciones Nueva Visión.

Schmitt, C. (2009): Der Begriff des Politischen, Berlin: Duncker&Humblot.

________ (2009b): Politische Theologie. Vier Kapitel zur Lehre von der Souveränität, Berlin: Duncker&Humblot.

________ (2016): Was geschah im 21. Jahrhundert?, Berlin: Suhrkamp.

Tuunainen, J. (2005): “Contesting a Hybrid Firm at a Traditional University”, Social Studies of Science, 35, pp. 173-210.

Vaccari, A. (2016): “Aporías transhumanistas: Ideologías de la tecnología en el proyecto del auto-diseño humano”, Quadranti –Rivista Internazionale di Filosofia Contemporanea, IV, pp. 286-316.

Waters, B. (2006): From Human to Posthuman. Christian Theology and Technology in a Posthuman World, Burlington: Ashgate.

Ẑiẑek, S. (2016): El sublime objeto de la idelogía, Buenos Aires: Siglo XXI.