Mary Wollstonecraft and the vindication of women's rights

Main Article Content

Rosa Peña Vallejos
Rodrigo Colarte Olivares

Abstract

This article addresses Mary Wollstonecraft's (1759-1797) critique of Rousseau's educational vision presented in his work Emile. The debate in question is a significant episode in the historic struggle for women's rights, in which Wollstonecraft demands, as a right, a comprehensive public space for women. The topic of interest is whether the author's proposal to change the paradigm from that of a domestic slave to an enlightened citizen implies recognition of moral and civic responsibility for women; and whether the path of granting dignity to women through equivalent education for both sexes necessarily entails women abandoning their formative role as educators of their children at home. Likewise, it is of interest to determine whether, in Wollstonecraft's thinking, the transformation of motherhood into a civic task and the recognition of women as rational sexed subjects generate a different vision of rationality that breaks with the male paradigm.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Peña Vallejos, R., & Colarte Olivares, R. (2019). Mary Wollstonecraft and the vindication of women’s rights. Revista De Filosofia UCSC, 18(1), 35–43. https://doi.org/10.21703/2735-6353.2019.18.01.0003
Section
Articles
Author Biography

Rodrigo Colarte Olivares, Universidad Católica de la Santísima Concepción Concepción, Chile

Profesor Asistente de la Facultad de Estudios Teológicos y Filosofía de la Universidad Católica de la Santísima Concepción (UCSC). Especialista en Filosofía Política. Sus líneas de Investigación son la Filosofía Política, Ética y Antropología Filosófica.

References

Amorós, C., Miguel, A. (2010): “Feminismo e Ilustración”, en Teoría feminista de la Ilustración a la globalización. Tomo I. Madrid: Minerva.

Bernal, A. (1998): Movimientos Feministas y cristianismo. Madrid: Rialp.

Cobo, R. (1994): “La construcción social de la mujer en Mary Wollstonecraft”, en Amorós, C. (Coord.) Historia de la teoría feminista. Madrid: Instituto de Investigación Feminista. Universidad Complutense de Madrid.

Espina, Gioconda. (2007): Todas mujeres pero diferentes. Revista Venezolana de Estudios de la Mujer, 12(28), 127-142,pp. Recuperado de http://www.scielo.org.ve/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1316-37012007000100007&lng=es&tlng=es.

Lois, M. (2005): Wollstonecraft en Introducción libro Vindicación de los derechos de la mujer. Madrid: Istmo. Recuperado de http://books.google.cl/books?id=sE64epomOMMC&pg=PA5&hl=es&source=gbs_toc_r&cad=4#v=onepage&q&f=false

MacKenzie, C. (1993:. Reason and Sensibility: The Ideal of Women’s Self­Governance in the Writings of Mary Wollstonecraft. Hypatia, 8(4), 35-55, pp. Recuperado de http://www.jstor.org.dti.sibucsc.cl/stable/3810368

Palumbo, D. (2011): Mary Wollstonecraft, Jonathan Swift, and the Passion in Reading. Studies in English Literature, 1500-1900,51(3), 625-644, pp. Recuperado de.-http://www.jstor.org.dti.sibucsc.cl/stable/23028068

Saenz Berceo, M. C.(2013): “Mary Wollstonecraft: referente feminista” Redur II, diciembre 2013. Recuperado de http://www.unirioja.es/dptos/dd/redur/numero11/saenz.pdf

Sledziewski, E. (1993): “Revolución francesa. El giro”, en Duby, G., Perrot, M. Historia de las mujeres. Tomo IV. Madrid: Taurus.

Wollstonecraft, M. (2005): Vindicación de los derechos de la mujer. Madrid: Taurus.

Wollstonecraft, M. (2004): A Vindication of the Rights of Woman. Great Britain: Penguin Books.

Zaw, S. (1998): The Reasonable Heart: Mary Wollstonecraft’s View of the Relation between Reason and Feeling in Morality, Moral Psychology, and Moral Development. Hypatia, 13(1), 78-117, pp. Recuperado en http://www.jstor.org.dti.sibucsc.cl/stable/3810608.