Two natures in the person of christ?”Analysis of the concept of unity ’´(ενωσις) in the work “why is Christ one?” by Cyril of Alexandria

Authors

  • Ricardo Andrés Ramírez Basualdo Universidad Católica del Maule, Talca, Chile

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21703/2735-634520192121803

Keywords:

Unity (ενωσις), Cyril of Alexandria, Nature, hypostasis, Christ

Abstract

This article aims to analyze and explain the concept of unity (ενωσις) of human and divine natures in the person of Christ, in Cyril of Alexandria from a study of his work “Why is Christ one?” (378-444). The work will focus on the concept of unity (ενωσις) that Saint Cyril uses to refer to the hypostatic union of the two natures of Christ: the divine and the human. To achieve this, this exhibition will be divided into three chapters that will answer the methodical question that guides the research. In the first section, the life and work of the author will be approached, as a way to understand the schools, thoughts and doctrine that influence the context in which the author raises the work within which is the Christological enosis (ενωσις). Then, in a second section, to address an analysis of the concept of unity in the person of Christ from the work already mentioned. Finally, an analysis will be made of the main images that Cyril of Alexandria uses to explain unity (ενωσι).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Ricardo Andrés Ramírez Basualdo, Universidad Católica del Maule, Talca, Chile

Profesor de Filosofía, Licenciado en Filosofía y Licenciado en Educación por la Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso; Magister en Ciencias Religiosas y Filosóficas mención Teología por la Universidad Católica del Maule; Becario Conicyt (2016). Actualmente es Profesor de ética profesional Universidad Santo Tomás, Sede Viña del Mar. Miembro del Centro de Investigación en Religión y Sociedad (CIRS) de la Facultad de Ciencias religiosas y filosóficas de la Universidad Católica del Maule, Chile. Correo electrónico: ricardoramirezba@santotomas.cl

References

Artemi, E., “Cyril of Alexandria’s critique of the term Theotokos by Nestorius Constantinople”. Acta theologica 32/2 (2012) 1 -16.

_________, “The rejection of the term Theotokos by Nestorius Constantinople and the refutation of his teaching by Cyril of Alexandria”, De Medio Aevo 2/2 (2012) 125- 146

Camelot, P. Th., Éfeso y Calcedonia, Eset, Vitoria 1962.

Cirilo de Alej andría, ¿Por qué Cristo es uno?, Ciudad Nueva, Madrid 1991.

Gavrilyuk, P., “Theopatheia; Nestorius’s main charge against Cyril of Alexandria”. Scottish Journal of Theology 56/2 (2003) 190-207.

Hasberg, M., “The Cristology of St. Cyril of Alexandria and the representation of Cyrilline Christology in the Chalcedonian definition”, Partial fulfillment of real (516) Patristic Christology. Yale University, Yale Divinity School, 2016.

McGuckin, J., St. Cyril of Alexandría the Christological controversy, its history, theology, and texts, Brill, Leiden- New York 1994.

Soto- Hay, F., “El concilio ecuménico de Éfeso”, Anámnesis 16/31 (2006), 1-55.

Wilken, R., “Exegesis and the history of theology: Reflections on the Adam- Christ typology in Cyril of Alexandria”, Church History 35/2 (1996) 139-156.

Published

2023-01-04

How to Cite

Ramírez Basualdo, R. A. (2023). Two natures in the person of christ?”Analysis of the concept of unity ’´(ενωσις) in the work “why is Christ one?” by Cyril of Alexandria. Anales De Teología, 21(2), 215–236. https://doi.org/10.21703/2735-634520192121803