Sobre el pragmatismo legal: ¿Dónde nos conduce ‘La senda del Derecho’?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21703/issn2735-6337/2025.n46.03Palabras clave:
Pragmatismo jurídico, Oliver Wendell Holmes, tradición pragmática clásica, teoría del derecho, realismo jurídicoResumen
Todo esto empieza con un par de preguntas que suenan aparentemente muy sencillas: «¿Qué es el pragmatismo jurídico? y ¿Hay algo valioso en él?». Sin embargo, termina con respuestas no tan simples: «Aquello que hoy en día es llamado “pragmatismo jurídico” es muy diferente del antiguo estilo de pragmatismo jurídico tradicionalmente asociado con Oliver Wendell Holmes; y hay elementos valiosos en la concepción del Derecho revelada a través de la lectura de The Path of the Law [La senda del Derecho] de Holmes a la luz de la filosofía de tradición pragmatista clásica, aunque menos en el neopragmatismo legal contemporáneo». A medida que articulo y defiendo estas respuestas, mis reflexiones sobre las variedades de pragmatismo –filosófico y jurídico, antiguo y nuevo– serán envueltas alrededor de mi exploración del significado de The Path of the Law y las fortalezas y debilidades de sus argumentos.
Descargas
Referencias
Doctrina citada
ALBERSTEIN, Michal (2002): Pragmatism and Law: From Philosophy to Dispute Resolution (Dartmouth, Ashgate).
ALSCHULER, Albert (2000): Law Without Values: The Life, Work, and Legacy of Justice Holmes (Chicago, University of Chicago Press).
ATIYAH, Patrick (1987): Pragmatism and Theory in English Law (London, Stevens and Sons).
AUSTIN, Jhon (1962): How to Do Things With Words (Cambridge, Harvard University Press).
BAKER, Liva (1991): The Justice from Beacon Hill: The Life and Time of Oliver Wendell Holmes (Nueva York, Harper Collins).
BALDWIN, James (1902): Dictionary of Philosophy and Psychology (New York, McMillan).
BOWEN, Catharine (1944): Yankee from Olympus (Boston, Atlantic/Little Brown).
BREWER, Scott (2000): “Traversing Holme’s Path toward Jurisprudence of Logical form”, en: Burton, Steven (editor), “The Path of the Law” and Its influence: The legacy of Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr. (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).
BYNUM, Terrell (1972): Conceptual Notation and Related Articles (Oxford, Clarendon Press).
CARDOZO, Benjamin (1921): “Introduction”, en: Frankfurter, Felix (editor), Mr. Justice Holmes (Nueva York, Coward McCann).
CLARKE, Charles (1974): Shakespeare-characters (New York, Ams Press).
COGLIANESE, Gary (2003): “Does Consensus Work? A Pragmatic Approach to Public Participation in the Regulatory Process”, en: Morales, Alfonso (editor), Renascent Pragmatism: Studies in Law and Social Science (Aldershot, Ashgate).
COHEN, Felix (editor) (1948): “The Holmes-Cohen Correspondence”, en: Journal of the History of Ideas (vol. IX núm. 1).
COHEN, Morris (1921): “Justice Holmes”, en: Frankfurter, Felix (editor), Mr. Justice Holmes (Nueva York, Coward McCann).
DAMASKA, Mirjan (1978): “A Foreign Perspective on the American Judicial System”, en: Fetter, Theodore (editor), State Courts: A Blueprint for the Future (New York, National Center for State Courts).
DANCY, Jonathan y SOSA, Ernest (editors) (1992): A Companion to Epistemology (Oxford, Blackwell).
Dewey, Jhon (1921): “Justice Holmes and the Liberal Mind”, en: Frankfurter, Felix (editor), Mr. Justice Holmes (Nueva York, Coward McCann).
DEWEY, Jhon (1960): The Quest for Certainty (New York, G. P. Putnam's Sons).
DEWEY, John (1929): Experience and Nature (New York, W. W. Norton).
DEWEY, John (1963): “The Development of American Pragmatism”, en: Philosophy and Civilization (New York, Capricorn edition).
FARBER, Daniel (1988): “Legal Pragmatism and the Constitution”, en: Minnesota Law Review (vol. 72).
FISCH, Max (1964): “Was There a Metaphysical Club in Cambridge?”, en: Moore, Edward y Robin, Richard (editors), Studies in the Philosophy of Charles Sanders Peirce (Amherst, University of Massachusetts Press).
FISCH, Max (1986): “Justice Holmes, the Prediction Theory of the Law, and Pragmatism”, en: Ketner, Kenneth y Kloesel, Christian (editors), Peirce, Semeiotic, and Pragmatism: Essays by Max Fisch (Bloomington, Indiana University Press).
FISH, Stanley (1990): “Almost Pragmatism: Richard Posner’s Jurisprudence”, en: University of Chicago Law Review (vol. 57 núm. 14).
FORD, John (1942): “The Fundamentals of Holmes’s Juristic Philosophy”, en: Fordham Law Review (vol. 11).
FRANK, Jerome (1970): Law and the Modern Mind (Gloucester, Peter Smith).
FRANKFURTER, Felix (1921): “Justice Holmes and the Constitution”, en: Frankfurter, Felix (editor), Mr. Justice Holmes (Nueva York, Coward McCann).
FULLER, Lon (1966): The Law in Quest of Itself (Boston, Beacon Press).
GALANTER, Marc (1981): “Justice in Many Rooms: Courts, Private Ordering, and Indigenous Law”, en: Journal of Legal Pluralism (vol. 19).
GREGG, Paul (1943): “The Pragmatism of Mr. Justice Holmes”, en: Georgetown Law Journal (vol. 31).
GREY, Thomas (1989): “Holmes and Legal Pragmatism”, en: Stanford Law Review (vol. 41).
GREY, Thomas (1990): “Hear the Other Side: Wallace Stevens and Pragmatist Legal Theory”, en: Southern California Law Review (vol. 63).
GREY, Thomas (1991): “What Good is Legal Pragmatism?”, en: Brint, Michael y Weaver, William (editors), Pragmatism in Law and Society (Boulder, Westview Press).
HAACK, Susan (1993): Evidence and Inquiry: Towards Reconstruction in Epistemology (Oxford, Blackwell).
HAACK, Susan (1998): Manifesto of a Passionate Moderate: Unfashionable Essays (Chicago, University of Chicago Press).
HAACK, Susan (2001): “Viejo y nuevo pragmatismo”, en: Dianoia (vol. 46 núm. 47).
HAACK, Susan (2002): “Realisms and Their Rivals: Recovering Our Innocence”, en: Facta Philosophica (vol. 4 núm. 1).
HAACK, Susan (2003): Defending Science - Within Reason: Between Scientism and Cynicism (New York, Prometheus Books).
HAACK, Susan (2004a): “Pragmatism, Old and New”, en: Contemporary Pragmatism (vol. 1 núm. 1).
HAACK, Susan (2004b): “Epistemology Legalized: Or, Truth, Justice, and the American Way”, en: The American Journal of Jurisprudence (vol. 49).
HAACK, Susan (2005): “On legal pragmatism: Where does 'the path of the law' lead us?”, en: American Journal of Jurisprudence (vol. 50 núm. 1).
HAACK, Susan (2006): “Not Cynicism but Synechism: Lessons from Classical Pragmatism”, en: Margolis, Joseph y Shook, John (editores), A Companion to Pragmatism (Oxford, Blackwell).
HAACK, Susan (2006): “Pragmatism, Old and New”, en: Haack, Susan y Lane, Robert (editors), Pragmatism, Old and New: Selected Writings (Amherst, Prometheus Books).
HAACK, Susan (2007): “On Logic in the Law: something, but not All’’, en: Ratio Juris (vol. 20 núm. 1).
HAACK, Susan (2011): “Pragmatism, Law, and Morality: The Lessons of Buck v. Bell”, en: European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy (vol. III núm. 2).
HANTZIS, Catharine (1988): “Legal Innovation Within the Wider Intellectual Tradition: The Pragmatism of Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr.”, en: Northwestern University Law Review (vol. 82).
HART, H. L. A. (1961): The Concept of Law (Oxford, Clarendon Press).
HART, Henry M. (1951): “Holmes’s Positivism -- An Addendum”, en: Harvard Law Review (vol. 64).
HOGUE, Arthur (1986): Origins of the Common Law (Indianápolis, Liberty Fund).
HOLMES, Oliver (1876): “Primitive Notions in Modern Law”, en: The American Law Review (vol X).
HOLMES, Oliver (1877): “Primitive Notions in Modern Law II”, en: The American Law Review (vol. XI).
HOLMES, Oliver (1964a): “The Law”, en: Marke, Julius (editor), The Holmes Reader (Dobbs Ferry, Oceana, Docket Series).
HOLMES, Oliver (1964b): “Learning and Science”, en: Marke, Julius (editor), The Holmes Reader (Dobbs Ferry, Oceana, Docket Series).
HOLMES, Oliver (1964c): “Law and the Court”, en: Marke, Julius (editor), The Holmes Reader (Dobbs Ferry, Oceana, Docket Series).
HOLMES, Oliver (1995a): “The Path of the Law”, en: Novick, Sheldon (editor), The Collected Works of Justice Holmes (Chicago, Chicago University Press).
HOLMES, Oliver (1995b): “The Common Law”, en: Novick, Sheldon (editor), The Collected Works of Justice Holmes (Chicago, Chicago University Press).
HOLMES, Oliver (2012): La senda del derecho (Traducc. José Solar Cayón, Madrid, Marcial Pons).
HOLMES, Oliver y POLLOCK, Frederick (1941): Holmes-Pollock Letters: The Correspondence of Mr. Justice Holmes and Sir Frederick Pollock, 1874-1932 (Cambridge, Harvard University Press).
HOWE, Mark (1951): “Holmes´ Positivism. A Brief Rejoinder”, en: Harvard Law Review (vol. 64).
HOWE, Mark (1957): Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes: The Shaping Years (Cambridge, Belknap Press of Harvard University Press).
HOY, David (1991): “Is Legal Originalism Compatible with Philosophical Pragmatism?”, en: Brint, Michael y Weaver, William (editors), Pragmatism in Law and Society (New Perspectives on Law, Culture and Society) (Boulder, Westview Press).
JAMES, William (1975): Pragmatism (Cambridge, Harvard University Press).
JAMES, William (1995): “The Moral Philosopher and the Moral Life”, en: Bird, Graham (editor), Selected Writings: James William (London, Everyman).
KALMAN, Laura (1996): The Strange Career of Legal Liberalism (New Haven, Yale University Press).
KELLEY, Patrick (1990): “Was Holmes a Pragmatist? Reflections on a New Twist to an Old Argument”, en: Southern Illinois Law Review (vol. 14).
KELLOG, Frederic (1984): The Formative Essays of Justice Holmes: The Making of an American Legal Philosophy (Westport, Greenwood Press).
KELLOG, Frederic (1984): The Formative Essays of Justice Holmes: The Making of an American Legal Philosophy (Westpor, Praeger).
KETNER, Kenneth y COOK, James (editores) (1979): Charles Sanders Peirce: Contributions to the Nations (Lubbock, Texas Tech Press).
LEAF, Murray (2003): “Pragmatic Legal Norms”, en: Morales, Alfonso (editor), Renascent Pragmatism: Studies in Law and Social Science (Aldershot, Ashgate).
LEITER, Brian (1998): “Naturalism and Pragmatism in Legal Theory”, en: Virginia Law Review (vol. 76 núm. 2).
LLEWELLYN, Karl (1930): “A Realistic Jurisprudence -- the Next Step”, en: Columbia Law Review (vol. 30 núm. 4).
LLEWELLYN, Karl (1930): The Bramble Bush: Our Law and Its Study (New York, Oceana).
LUBAN, David (1996): “What's Pragmatic About Legal Pragmatism?”, en: Cardozo Law Review (vol. 18).
LUBAN, David (1997): “The Bad Man and the Good Lawyer”, en: New York University Law Review (vol. 72).
LUCEY, Francis (1941): “Jurisprudence and the Future Social Order”, en: Social Science (vol. 16).
MARKE, Julius (1964): The Holmes Reader (Dobbs Ferry, Oceana, Docket Series).
NOVICK, Sheldon (1995): The Collected Works of Justice Holmes (Chicago, Chicago University Press).
PALMER, Ben (1945): “Hobbes, Holmes, and Hitler”, en: American Bar Association Journal (vol. 31).
PATTERSON, Dennis (1990): “Law's Pragmatism: Law as Practice and Narrative”, en: Virginia Law Review (vol. 76).
PEGLER, Westbrook (1950): “Fair Enough”, en: Boston Evening American (December 18, 1950).
PEIRCE, Charles (1868): The Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce (Cambridge, Harvard University Press), vol. 5.
PEIRCE, Charles (1871): Collected Papers (Cambridge, Harvard University Press).
PEIRCE, Charles (1871): The Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce (Cambridge, Harvard University Press), vol. 8.
PEIRCE, Charles (1931-1958): The Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce (Cambridge, Harvard University Press).
PERRY, Ralph (1935): The Thought and Character of William James (Boston, Little, Brown, and Company), vol. I.
PIERCE, Charles (1998): Chance, Love, and Logic (Lincoln, University of Nebraska Press).
POHLMAN, H. (1984): Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes and Utilitarian Jurisprudence (Cambridge, Harvard University Press).
POSNER, Richard (1990): Problems of Jurisprudence (Cambridge, Harvard University Press).
POSNER, Richard (2003): Law, Pragmatism, and Democracy (Cambridge, Harvard University Press).
POUND, Roscoe (1921): “Judge Holmes's Contributions to the Science of Law”, en: Harvard Law Review (vol. 34).
REED, Thomas; HORWITZ, Morton y FISHER, William (editores) (1993): American Legal Realism (New York, Oxford University Press).
RORTY, Richard (1990): “The Banality of Pragmatism and the Poetry of Justice”, en: Southern California Law Review (vol. 63).
RORTY, Richard (1991): Objectivity, Relativism and Truth (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).
RORTY, Richard (1992): “Trotsky and the Wild Orchids”, en: Common Knowledge (vol. 1 núm. 3).
SANTOS, Boaventura de Sousa (1995): Toward a New Common Sense (New York, Routledge).
SCHNEIDER, Anne y INGRAM, Helen (2003): “The Pragmatic Policy Analyst”, en: Morales, Alfonso (editor), Renascent Pragmatism: Studies in Law and Social Science (Aldershot, Ashgate).
SHRIVER, Harry (editor) (1940): The Judicial Opinions of Oliver Wendell Holmes: Constitutional Opinions, Selected Excerpts and Epigrams as Given in the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts (1883-1902) (Buffalo, Dennis).
SMITH, Steven (1990): “The Pursuit of Pragmatism”, en: Yale Law Journal (vol. 100).
SPENGLER, Oswald (1918-1922): Der Untergang des Abendlandes (Vienna, Braumiller).
SPENGLER, Oswald (1926-1928): The Decline of the West (Traducc. de Charles Atkinson, New York, Knopf).
STUDENT NOTE (1975): “Holmes, Peirce, and Legal Pragmatism”, en: The Yale Law Journal (vol. 84).
TAMANAHA, Brian (1997): Realistic Socio-Legal Theory: Pragmatism and a Social Theory of Law (Oxford, Clarendon Press).
TAMANAHA, Brian (2003): “A Pragmatic Response to the Embarrassing Problems of Ideology Critique in Socio-Legal Studies”, en: Morales, Alfonso (editor), Renascent Pragmatism: Studies in Law and Social Science (Aldershot, Ashgate).
THE NEW YORK TIMES (1935): “Columns 2-3” (6 de marzo de 1935).
TUFTS, James (1921): “The Legal and Social Philosophy of Mr. Justice Holmes”, en: American Bar Association Journal (vol. 7).
WARNER, Richard (1993): “Why Pragmatism? The Puzzling Place of Pragmatism in Critical Theory”, en: University of Illinois Law Review (año 1993).
WEAVER, William (2003): “The ‘Democracy of Self Devotion’: Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., and Pragmatism”, en: Morales, Alfonso (editor), Renascent Pragmatism: Studies in Law and Social Science (Aldershot, Ashgate).
WEINBERG, Louise (1997): “Holmes's Failure”, en: Michigan Law Review (vol. 96).
WEST, Robin (1984): “Liberalism Rediscovered: A Pragmatic Definition of the Liberal Vision”, en: University of Pittsburgh Law Review (vol. 46).
WHITE, Edward (1971): “The Rise and Fall of Justice Holmes”, en: The University of Chicago Law Review (vol. 39).
WHITE, Morton (1949): Social Thought in America: The Revolt Against Formalism (New York, Viking Press).
WIENER, Philip (1972): Evolution and the Founders of Pragmatism (Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania Press).
WILL, George (2005): “A Debate that Does not End”, en: Newsweek (4 de julio de 2005).
YOGAT, Rosal (1964): “Mr. Justice Holmes: Some Modern Views”, en: University of Chicago Law Review (vol. 31 núm. 2).
Jurisprudencia citada
Sioux City & Pac. R.R. Co. con Sout (1873): The Supreme Court of United States, 84 U.S. 657.
Smith con Moore (1889): Texas Court of Appeals, 148 Mass. 407, 19 N.E. 393.
Rideout con Knox (1889): United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court, 148 Mass. 368.
Miller con Horton (1891): United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court, 152 Mass 540, 26 N.E. 100.
Union Pac. Ry. Co. con MacDonald (1894): The Supreme Court of United States, 152 U.S. 262.
In re Municipal Suffrage to Women (1894): United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court, 160 Mass. 586, 36 N.E. 488.
Dunbar con Boston and Providence R. R. Corp (1902): United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court, 181 Mass. 383, 63 N.E. 916.
Lochner con New York (1905): The Supreme Court of United States, 198 U.S. 45.
Gompers con United States (1914): The Supreme Court of United States,233 U.S. 604, 610.
Southern Pacific con Jensen (1917): The Supreme Court of United States, 244 U.S. 205, 222.
Erie R. Co. con Hilt (1918): The Supreme Court of United States, 247 U.S. 97.
Abrams con United States (1919): The Supreme Court of United States, 250 U.S. 616, 629.
Missouri con Holland (1920): The Supreme Court of United States, 252 U.S. 416, 433.
Truax con Corrigan (1921): The Supreme Court of United States, 257 U.S. 312, 344.
United Zinc and Chemical Co. con Britt (1922): The Supreme Court of United States, 258 U.S. 268.
Buck con Bell (1927): The Supreme Court of United States, 274 U.S. 200, 207.
Javins con First National Reality Corporation (1970): US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, 428 F.2d 1071, 1.
Sindell con Abbott Laboratories (1980): California Supreme Court, 26 Cal.3d 588, 612, 607 P.2d 924, 937, 163 Cal. Reptr. 132, 145.
Bichler con Eli Lilly & Co. (1981): New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals, 79 A.D. 2d 317, 329, 436, N.Y.S.2d 625, 632.
Hymowitz con Eli Lilly & Co. (1989): New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals, 73 N.Y.2d 487, 512, 539 N.E.2d 1069, 1078, 541 N.Y.S.2d 941, 950.
Gonzalez con Raich (2005): The Supreme Court of United States, 125 S. Ct. 2195, 2238.
Descargas
Publicado
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2025 Revista de Derecho de la Universidad Católica de la Santísima Concepción
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
