Hydraulic stability evaluation of a diaphragm wall in granular soils recharged by an unconfined aquifer
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-28132014000100004Keywords:
diaphragm wall, seepage, piping, factor of safety, hydraulic gradientAbstract
Diaphragm walls are normally adopted for deep basements in granular soils because, among other reasons, they act as watertight retaining structures and can form part of the structure foundations. When the water table is high and the excavation is deep there is a likely risk of hydraulic stability problems. In this work two-dimensional flow nets around a diaphragm wall of 20 m depth and 0.8 m thickness are studied for different construction/ excavation stages. The water level behind the wall is the result of the excavation geometry, soil permeability and aquifer characteristics, i.e. a horizontal water level is not imposed. Using a commercial 2D steady flow software, distributions of velocities and hydraulic gradients are determined. Based on the definition of piping safety factor, a maximum excavation depth and a diaphragm wall minimum embedment are determined. Results using an isotropic coefficient of permeability value are compared with the anisotropic case. Hydrodynamic pressures over the wall are also determined and compared with hydrostatic pressures. Finally, it is pointed out that a minimum diaphragm wall embedment should be verified to avoid piping or erosion effects, which can be detrimental for the stability of the project during construction.
References
Aulbach, B. and Ziegler, M. (2013a). Hydraulic heave - Formula to determine the required embedded length. Bautechnik 90 (10), 631-641 (in German).
Aulbach, B. and Ziegler, M. (2013b). Simplified design of excavation support and shafts for safety against hydraulic heave. Geomechanics and Tunnelling 6(4), 362-374. https://doi.org/10.1002/geot.201300031
BS 8004 (1986). Code of Practice for Foundations. British Standards Institution, Milton Keynes, UK
EAB (2008). Recommendations on Excavations. Deutsche Gesellschaft für Geotechnick e.V., 2nd edition, Ernst & Sohn
EAU (2006). Recommendations of the Committee for Waterfront Structures, Harbours and Waterways. Committee for Waterfront Structures of the Society for Harbour Engineering and the German Society for Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Berlin: Ernst & Sohn
GE Ground Engineering (2009). Ground anchors could hold key to Cologne metro collapse. News April 2009
GGU-SS-FLOW2D (2008). Modelling of groundwater flow using finite elements in two-dimensional systems. Version 9. Civilserve GmbH, Steinfeld
Griffiths, D.V. (1994). Seepage beneath unsymmetric cofferdams. Géotechnique 44, No. 2, 297-305. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1994.44.2.297
Harr, M.E. (1990). Groundwater and seepage. Dover publications, New York
Marsland, A. (1953). Model experiments to study the influence of seepage on the stability of a sheeted excavation in sand. Géotechnique 3, Issue 6, 223-241. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1953.3.6.223
McNamee, J. (1949). Seepage into a sheeted excavation. Géotechnique 1, Issue 4, 229-241
NCE New Civil Engineer (2009). Diaphragm walls probed after Cologne collapse. 12 March 2009
NCh 3206 (2010). Geotecnia-excavaciones, entibaciones y socalzados. INN, Chile (in Spanish)
Powrie, W. (2004). Soil Mechanics. Concepts & Applications. Spon Press
Terzaghi, K. (1943). Theoretical soil mechanics. Wiley and Sons. New York
Ziegler, M., Aulbach, B., Heller, H. and Kuhlmann, D. (2009). The hydraulic heave - Design charts for determining the necessary embedded length. Bautechnik 86(9), 529 - 541 (in German)

Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2014 Universidad Católica de la Santísima Concepción

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.