Towards a more egalitarian school: a contextualized analysis of change
Abstract
School education in French-speaking Belgium has made widespread use of grade retention in managing pupils in difficulties. Since 1995, a number of political initiatives have aimed to reduce grade retention in primary schools, forbidding the repetition of a year within cycles of study and promoting changes in pedagógica! practices. The main goal of this reform is to fight the social selection observed with grade retention and to increase equality of opportunity and equality of results at school- leaving. An analysis of primary-level teachers' perceptions and practices highlights how much this reform confiicts with teachers' spontaneous conceptions of equality. In this way, different meanings of equality are presented and discussed in this paper. Competition between schools in a quasi-market environment also appears as an obstacle to the egalitarian project.
Key words: School education, Grade retention, Social selection, Equality.
Downloads
References
ARNSPERGER, C., 8c VAN PARIJS, P. (2000) Ethique économique et sociale (Paris: La Découverte).
BALL, S. (1994) Education reform. A critica! and post-structural approach (Buckingham: Qpen University Press).
BOLTANSKI, L., 8c THEVENOT, L. (1991) De la justification. Les économies de la grandeur (Paris: Gallimard).
BLOOM, B.S. (1976) Human characteristics and school learning (New York: Me Graw Hill).
CATTONAR, B., 8c MAROY, C. (2000) Rhétorique du changement du métier d'enseignant et strategie de transformation de l'institution scolaire, Education et societés, 6, 21-42.
CHOSSON, J.-F. (1991) Pratique de Tentraínement mental (Paris: Armand Colin).
CORCUFF, P. (1995) Les nouvelles sociologies (Paris: Nathan Université).
CRAHAY, M,, 8c DONNAY, J. (2002) Ou en sont les écoles dans la mise en place du décret relatif a ¡a promotion d'une école de la réusslte ? Rapport de recherche fBrussells: Ministére de l'éducation).
CRAHAY, M. (1996) Peut-on lutter contre l'échec scolaire ? fBrussells: De Boeck Université).
DUBET, F. (1987) La galére: jeunes en survíe (Paris: Fayard).
DUBET, F. (2002) Pourquoi ne croit-on pas les sociologues ?, Education et socíétés, 9 13-25
DUPRIEZ, V., CORNET, J., BODSON, X., 8c DE SMET, N. (2003) La formation des classes et la gestión de l'hétérogénéité a l'école primaire. Rapport de recherche (Brussells: Ministére de l'Education).
DUPRIEZ, V., 8c MAROY CHRISTIAN. (2000) El sistema escolar como montaje híbrido: AQué redefinición del establecimiento?, Revista de Tecnología Educativa, 14 (1-2), 149-176.
DUPRIEZ, V., 8c MAROY CHRISTIAN. (2003) Regulation in school systems: a theoretical analysis of the structural framework of the school system in French- speaking Belgium, Journal of Education Policy, 18 (4), 375-392.
DUPRIEZ, V., 8c VANDENBERGHE, V. (2004) L'école en Communauté frangaise de Belgique: de queile inégalité parlons-nous ?, Les Cahiers de recherche en éducation et en formation, 27, 3-26.
EGREES. (2003) Equity of the European educational systems. A set of indicators ÓLiége: Departement of theoretical and experimental education, University of Liége).
GEWIRTZ, S,, BALL, S., 8c BOWE, R. (1995) Markets, choice and equity in education (Buckingham, Philadelphia: Open University Press).
GORARD, S., &SMITH, E. (2004) An ¡nternational comparison of equity in education systems, Comparative Education, 40 (1), 15-28.
GOSSERIES, A. (2000) Le labyrinthe des égalitarismes, Le banquet, 15, 57-75.
LINCOLN, Y.S., & GUBA, E.G. (1985) Naturalistic inquiry (Newbury park, CA: Sage).
RAWLS, J. (1971) A theory of justice (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
TEDDLIE, C., 8c REYNOLDS, D. (2000) The international handbook of school effectiveness research (London: Falmer Press).
VANDENBERGHE, V. (1999) Combining market and bureaucratic control in education: an answer to market and bureaucratic failure ?, Comparative Education, 35(3), 271-282.
WALZER, M. (1983) Spheres of justice. A defense of pluralism and equality (New York: Basic Books).
